Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.44 seconds)Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 146 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Gorantla Venkateswara Rao vs Kolla Veera Raghava Rao And Anr. on 7 October, 2005
In the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Andhra
Pradesh in Gorantla Venkateshwara Rao Vs. Kolla
Veeraraghava Rao and another case, it was held that failing
on the part of accused in giving reply to the legal notice
issued by the complainant, is one of the strong
circumstances to draw a inference that accused has
borrowed amount from the complainant and cheque was
issued towards payment of legally enforceable debt. Here, in
this case on hand also in spite of receipt of legal notice also
the accused did not chose to give reply, hence it is also one
of the circumstances which clear supports the case of
complainant.
Rohitbhai Jivanlal Patel vs The State Of Gujarat on 1 February, 2021
21. Regarding the burden of the accused to rebut the
presumptions in N.I Act the Hon'ble Apex Court in
Rohitbhai Jivanlal Patel Vs State Of Gujarat in Crl.A.No.508
OF 2019 held:
Section 200 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
1