Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Bihar And Ors vs Mohd. Idris Ansari on 25 April, 1995
24. Now, we come to Rule 139 of the Bihar
Pension Rules, which also has been interpreted in Md. Idris
Ansari (supra); paragraph 9 and 10 from the cited decision is
extracted hereunder: -
P.V. Mahadevan vs M.D. Tamil Nadu Housing Board on 8 August, 2005
In the
case of P. V. Mahadevan (supra) there was delay of 12 years in
initiating disciplinary proceedings, upon which the charge
memo itself was set aside. Here, the appointments made in the
CBI were continued for long and even after a CBI report was
submitted to the Court; the further action took another 14 years,
i.e. commenced in 2016. With respect to the appeals first
considered, it was again much later. We also have to observe
that in the inquiry conducted, no witnesses were examined. The
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1219 of 2023 dt.27-02-2024
35/39
CBI report relied on was also not marked and proved through an
officer who conducted the investigation.
Roop Singh Negi vs Punjab National Bank & Ors on 19 December, 2008
270. We extract para 14 of the said decision, which applied on
all fours:-
Prema Kumari & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 17 January, 2017
34. The petitioner, along with others who were
terminated approached this Court in CWJC No. 15713 of 2016
(Prema Kumari & Anr Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors) which
was allowed, with liberty left to proceed in accordance with law
(Annexure-13). The judgment of the learned Single Judge, was
also affirmed by a Division Bench as per Annexure-14. By
Annexure-15 dated 20.02.2017 the petitioner was reinstated in
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1219 of 2023 dt.27-02-2024
29/39
service. Annexure-16 also granted benefits of continuity of
service to the petitioner and other similarly situated teachers.
While she was so continuing in employment, memo of charges
(Annexure-17) dated 18.01.2018 was issued again against her.
The inquiry was concluded exonerating her of the charges by
Annexure 22 dated 22.02.2019. She retired on 30.08.2019 and
the PPO issued to her is marked as Annexure 24.
1