Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.91 seconds)The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Amit Shrivas on 29 September, 2020
In the
present case, it is evident that no such sincere efforts have
been made, particularly when we find that shops were
FIR No.495/19
State vs Amit @ Amita
Digitally
U/s 25 Arms Act, PS Uttam Nagar signed by Pages 6 of 7
ALKA
ALKA SINGH
SINGH Date:
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 25 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
State Nct Of Delhi vs Amit Sharma & Ors. on 4 July, 2018
Metropolitan Magistrate-08/South-West
Dwarka Courts: New Delhi
FIR No.495/19
State vs Amit @ Amita
U/s 25 Arms Act, PS Uttam Nagar Pages 7 of 7
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Giri Raj Singh Meena vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 20 January, 2014
2022.08.18
15:25:28
+0530
However, the said documents would show that they contained the number of
the FIR. It shows the serious infirmity in the case of prosecution as either the
number of the FIR was inserted later on or that it was prepared before the
time it has been shown to has been prepared. Be that as it may the same
creates a reasonable doubt in the story of prosecution. The reliance is placed
on the judgment of Giri Raj Vs. State 83 (2000) DLT 201, Mohd. Hashim,
Appellant Vs. State, 2000 CRI.L.J. 1510, Pawan Kumar Vs. Delhi
Administration, 1987 CCC 585 and Mewa Ram Vs. State 2000 CRI.L.J. 114.
Rajesh Jagdamba Avasthi vs State Of Goa on 3 November, 2004
14. Further it was held in Rajesh Jagdamba Avasthi Vs. State of Goa (2005)
9 SCC 773, in para 15 of the judgment in this regard the Hon'ble Supreme
Court held as under:
Rattan Lal vs State Of Punjab on 10 April, 1964
15. Chapter 22 Rule 49 of Punjab Police Rules, 1934, provides that the hour
of arrival and departure on duty at or from a police station of all enrolled
police officers of whatever rank, whether posted at the police station or
elsewhere, with a statement of the nature of their duty shall be entered vide a
separate entry and this entry shall be made immediately on arrival or prior to
the departure of the officer concerned and shall be attested by the latter
personality by signature or seal. In the present case, no departure or the
arrival entry has been proved on the record by the prosecution. In absence of
the departure and arrival entry of the police officials their presence at the spot
cannot be believed. Reference can be made to on Rattan Lal Vs. State 1987
(2) Crimes 29.
1