Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.23 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 28 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Section 23 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Vinod Kimar Kejriwal vs Usha Vinod Kejriwal on 20 March, 1992
13. The view which I have taken is also supported by the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Vinod Kumar Kejriwal v. Usha Vinod Kejriwal in which it has been held as follows:
Section 21 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Rishi Dev Anand vs Devinder Kaur on 28 September, 1984
In support of his submission, he has placed reliance on a judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of Rishi Dev Anand v. Devinder Kaur and my attention has been drawn to paragraph No. 8 of the said judgment, which reads as follows:
Ramesh H. Jadhwani vs Savita Ramesh Jadhwani on 17 September, 1985
In the case of Ramesh v. Savita, reported in 3 MC 74 this Court was dealing with the question as to whether pending the application under Rule 13 of Order 9 the wife could maintain an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The learned Chief Justice answered the question in the affirmative. Applying the same ratio and bearing in mind the object of the provisions contained in Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, I have no hesitation in holding that even pending the application made by the husband under Order 9 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the wife can initiate proceedings under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. It should be borne in mind that, in general, the husband is bound to defray the wife's costs of the proceedings under the Act and to provide her with the maintenance and support pending disposal of the proceedings. Having regard to the object that is sought to be achieved by making provision for awarding maintenance pendente lite and for making provision for payment of expenses of proceedings, the expression 'proceedings under the Act" appearing in Section 24 cannot be given a narrow and restrictive meaning.
Smt. Dipti Ghosh vs Swapan Kumar Ghosh on 18 July, 1990
14. This view finds support from the judgment of Calcutta High Court in the case of Dipti Ghosh v. Swapan Kumar Ghosh 1991 DMC 135 in which it has been held as follows:
1