Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.47 seconds)Section 320 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 320 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Shakuntala Sawhney vs Kaushalya Sawhney on 4 April, 1979
In the light of the judicial precedents referred to above, given the terms of
compromise, placement of parties, and other factors peculiar to the case, the contents of the
compromise deed and its objectives point towards its acceptance.
Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 2 November, 2018
In Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association v State of Himachal Pradesh, 2018 (4) Crimes
324, Hon'ble Supreme Court holds "[47]. As far as Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 135 of 2017 is
concerned, the appellants came to this Court challenging the order of cognizance only
because of the reason that matter was already pending as the appellants had filed the
Special Leave Petitions against the order of the High Court rejecting their petition for
quashing of the FIR/Chargesheet. Having regard to these peculiar facts, writ petition has also
been entertained. In any case, once we hold that FIR needs to be quashed, order of cogni-
zance would automatically stands vitiated."
Section 147 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Bharti vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 27 February, 2014
In Bharti v. State of Haryana, 2014(4) SCC 14, Hon'ble Supreme Court holds,
[6]. We are mindful of the fact that Section 354 of the IPC is, as of
today, non-compoundable. But, as noticed by us, it was compound-
able when the instant offence was committed with the permission
of the court. Even then, we would have hesitated to permit com-
pounding of the offence. But, facts of this case are very peculiar. Re-
spondent No.2 and her husband have, even today, maintained their
stand taken in the trial court that they have entered into a compro-
mise with the appellant. As we have already noted, respondent No.2
has filed an affidavit to that effect in this Court. Compromise is,
therefore, not an afterthought. Pertinently, the incident in question
2 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 06-07-2022 05:26:45 :::
CRM-M No. 9710 of 2022 --3--