Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 31 (0.35 seconds)
The Goa Mrf Employees Union, A ... vs Mrf Ltd., A Company Incorporated Under ... on 2 May, 2003
cites
Section 33 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Management Of Hotel Imperial, New ... vs Hotel Workers' Union on 21 May, 1959
(e) I am unable to agree with Mr. Sardessais submission that the observations of the Supreme Court are neither ratio nor obiter dicta. The question whether interim reliefs could be granted in proceedings under Section 10 or not squarely fell for consideration. The observations regarding the power to grant interim reliefs can hardly be said to be mere casual observations. They constitute at the very least, obiter dicta. Thus, in my view, the Supreme Court in the case of Hotel Imperial (supra), held that under Section 10(4) the tribunal has the power to grant interim reliefs, including in the nature of injunctions.
Income Tax Officer vs M.K. Mohammed Kunhi on 11 September, 1968
I am also unable to agree with the conclusion that Income Tax Officer, Cannanore vs. M. K. Mohammed Kunhi AIR 1969 SC 430 , can have no application to a case under the Industrial Disputes Act as it confers a special original jurisdiction on the Industrial Tribunal.
Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. vs Parameswara Menon on 9 August, 1979
In view thereof also it must be held that the judgment in Dhanalakshmi Banks case (supra) is not good law. (e).
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Grindlays Bank Ltd vs Central Government Industrial ... on 12 December, 1980
17. The preamble to the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), itself states that it was enacted as it was found expedient to make provision for the investigation and settlement of industrial disputes. The Act is a legislation to ensure social justice to both employers and employees and advance the progress of industry by bringing about the existence of harmony and cordial relations between the parties. In addition, it has also as its object, industrial peace, to ensure fair terms to workmen and to prevent disputes between employers and employees so that production might not be adversely affected and the larger interests of the public might not suffer. As observed by the Supreme Court in Grindlays Bank Ltd. vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal & Ors., , the purpose of the Act is to settle disputes between workmen and employers which, if not settled would result in strikes and lock-outs and entail dislocation of work essential to the life of the community. The scheme of the Act it was held, shows that it aims at settlement of all industrial disputes by peaceful methods and through the machinery of conciliation, arbitration and, if necessary, by approaching the Tribunals constituted under the Act. It thus endeavours the resolution of competing claims by finding a solution which is just and fair to both the parties.