Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.25 seconds)

Ratansinh Dalsukhbhai Nayak vs State Of Gujarat on 29 October, 2003

28. We have also noticed that in paragraph '21' of her deposition PW-1 has stated that she had not shown the place of occurrence to Daroga Ji, her mother had shown the place of occurrence but after how many days the place of occurrence was shown was not known to PW-1. She remained silent on this question. She did not remember that after how many days of the occurrence she had met Daroga Ji and she also did not remember that at which place Daroga Ji had interrogated her. This witness was suggested by the defence that the appellant, who is the maternal grandfather of the victim, had a land dispute with the 8 Ratansinh Dalsukhbhai Nayak v. State of Gujarat, (2004) 1 SCC 64 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 7 9 Sarkar, Law of Evidence, 19th Edn., Vol.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 121 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 3 Next