Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)
Peerless General Finance And ... vs Harikrishna Althal (Major) S/O. Late ... on 14 December, 2007 cites

Syndicate Bank vs Sri Venkatarama Murlidhar Shenoy on 20 January, 2004

Learned Counsel for the respondent placed reliance on the decision in the case of Syndicate Bank v. Sri Venkatarama Murlidhar Shenoy reported in 2004-III-LLJ-73 (Cal-DB) to contend that, since fair opportunity has not been given to the respondent and the relevant documents and the witnesses have not been produced in the enquiry, action taken by the appellant, is arbitrary and unsustainable. We do not find merit in the submission. In the instant case, appellant has examined the concerned witnesses and has produced the documents to establish the charge. Evidence of MWs.2 and 3 with regard to the charge levelled against the respondent is relevant, which has been considered by the enquiry officer and also by the Industrial Tribunal. The said decision, in the facts and circumstances of this case, has no application.
Calcutta High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 2 - A K Banerjee - Full Document
1