Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.33 seconds)
M/S Delhi Foot Wear vs Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2014 cites

Nazir Ahmad vs Emperor (No. 2) on 16 June, 1936

13. Law is well-settled that when the statute requires to do certain thing in certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not at all. Other methods or mode of performance are impliedly and necessarily forbidden. The aforesaid settled legal proposition is based on a legal maxim "Expressio unius est exclusion alteris" meaning thereby that if a statute provides for a thing to be done in a particular manner, then it has to be done in that manner and in no other manner and following other course is not 8 permissible. [See Taylor v. Taylor, (1876) 1 Ch.D.426; Nazir Ahmed v. King Emperor, AIR 1936 PC 253; Ram Phal Kundu v. Kamal Sharma; and Indian Bank's Association v. Devkala Consultancy Service, AIR 2004 SC 2615, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. -v- Essar Power Ltd., (2008) 4 SCC 755)].
Bombay High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 800 - Full Document

Ram Phal Kundu vs Kamal Sharma on 23 January, 2004

13. Law is well-settled that when the statute requires to do certain thing in certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not at all. Other methods or mode of performance are impliedly and necessarily forbidden. The aforesaid settled legal proposition is based on a legal maxim "Expressio unius est exclusion alteris" meaning thereby that if a statute provides for a thing to be done in a particular manner, then it has to be done in that manner and in no other manner and following other course is not 8 permissible. [See Taylor v. Taylor, (1876) 1 Ch.D.426; Nazir Ahmed v. King Emperor, AIR 1936 PC 253; Ram Phal Kundu v. Kamal Sharma; and Indian Bank's Association v. Devkala Consultancy Service, AIR 2004 SC 2615, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. -v- Essar Power Ltd., (2008) 4 SCC 755)].
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 123 - G P Mathur - Full Document

Indian Banks' Association, Bombay & Ors vs M/S Devkala Consultancy Service & Ors on 16 April, 2004

13. Law is well-settled that when the statute requires to do certain thing in certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not at all. Other methods or mode of performance are impliedly and necessarily forbidden. The aforesaid settled legal proposition is based on a legal maxim "Expressio unius est exclusion alteris" meaning thereby that if a statute provides for a thing to be done in a particular manner, then it has to be done in that manner and in no other manner and following other course is not 8 permissible. [See Taylor v. Taylor, (1876) 1 Ch.D.426; Nazir Ahmed v. King Emperor, AIR 1936 PC 253; Ram Phal Kundu v. Kamal Sharma; and Indian Bank's Association v. Devkala Consultancy Service, AIR 2004 SC 2615, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. -v- Essar Power Ltd., (2008) 4 SCC 755)].
Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 85 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 Next