Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)
Union Of India And Ors vs No Jc 665871L Sub Maj Hon Lt Prem Singh And ... on 5 November, 2024 cites

Union Of India vs Ram Avtar on 25 March, 2010

19. Further, since in terms of the judgment rendered by the Apex Court, in case titled as 'Union of India Vs. Ram Avtar', reported in 2014 SCC Online 1761, whereins, a declaration is made to the extent, that the benefit of rounding off, rather has to become endowed to the concerned. Resultantly also thereunders an indefeasible right became vested in the present respondent for his seeking qua the apposite roundings off being made in his favour.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - R Singh - Full Document

Dharamvir Singn vs Union Of India & Ors on 2 July, 2013

16. A reading of the records reveals that at the time of the apposite enlistment taking place rather no note became made in terms of the principles (supra) declared by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case titled as Dharamvir Singh Vs. Union of India (supra) by the Medical Board, that some disease which however, did not forbid the present respondent, to become enlisted in the Army, did make its preliminary onsettings. If so, the declaration of law in judgment (supra) that therebys there is a presumption that the incurring of the said disease was a sequel of rendition of service, is required to be favourably endowed vis-a-vis the respondent. Though the said presumption is rebuttable but the onus to lead evidence to rebut the said presumption became cast upon the petitioner. However, the said cast evidence adducing discharging onus vis-a-vis the respondent, rather for cogently rebutting the said presumption, but naturally also did cast an onerous duty also upon the Medical Board, to engage itself in the endeavour of unearthing, through employments of the State of Art block chain genetic causal connection technique(s), wherebys it may became unraveled that the onsetting of the disease onto the army personnel, became sourced from antecedental genetic family history. Moreover, 10 of 13 ::: Downloaded on - 07-11-2024 00:32:04 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:144562-DB CWP-16073-2024 -11- therebys it was also required to be stated in the medical opinion, that the disease but for a well formed reason rather was a congenital disease and became neither aggravated by nor became attributable to military service.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 56 - Full Document
1