Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.39 seconds)
K. Vatchala vs State Of Uttar on 3 February, 2026 cites

Saumya Chaurasia vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 9 October, 2023

Considering the facts available, this Court observed that there was a bold attempt by and on behalf of the appellant therein to misrepresent the facts for challenging the order [Saumya Chaurasia v. Directorate of Enforcement, 2023 SCC OnLine Chh 1907] impugned therein, regarding the conduct of the parties and the counsel, this Court made the following observations : (Saumya Chaurasia case [Saumya Chaurasia v. Enforcement Directorate, (2024) 6 SCC 401 : 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1674 : 2023 INSC 1073] , SCC para 13) "13. It cannot be gainsaid that every party approaching the court seeking justice is expected to make full and correct disclosure of material facts and that every advocate being an officer of the court, though appearing for a particular party, is expected to assist the court fairly in carrying out its function to administer the justice. It hardly needs to be emphasised that a very high standard of professionalism and legal acumen is expected from the advocates particularly designated senior advocates appearing in the highest court of the country so that their professionalism may be followed and emulated by the advocates practising in the High Courts and the District Courts. Though it is true that the advocates would settle the pleadings and argue in the courts on instructions given by their clients, however their duty to diligently verify the facts from the record of the case, using their legal acumen for which they are engaged, cannot be obliviated."
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hari Narain vs Badri Das on 4 March, 1963

In Hari Narain v. Badri Das [AIR 1963 SC 1558] stress was laid on litigants eschewing inaccurate, untrue or misleading statements, otherwise leave granted to an appellant may be revoked. It was observed as follows: (AIR p. 1560, para 9) "9. ...It is of utmost importance that in making material statements and setting forth grounds in applications for special leave care must be taken not to make any statements which are inaccurate, untrue or misleading. In dealing with applications for special leave, the Court naturally takes statements of fact and grounds of fact contained in the petitions at their face value and it would be unfair to betray the confidence of the Court by making statements which are untrue and misleading. That is why we have come to the conclusion that in the present case, special leave granted to the appellant ought to be revoked. Accordingly, special leave is revoked and the appeal is dismissed. The appellant will pay the costs of the respondent."
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 166 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

Chandra Shashi vs Anil Kumar Verma on 14 November, 1994

"2. About three decades ago, this Court in Chandra Shashi v. Anil Kumar Verma [Chandra Shashi v. Anil Kumar Verma, (1995) 1 SCC 421 : 1995 SCC (Cri) 239] was faced with a situation where an attempt was made to deceive the Court and interfere with the administration of justice. The litigant was held to be guilty of contempt of court. It was a case in which the husband had filed fabricated document to oppose the prayer of his wife seeking transfer of matrimonial proceedings. Finding him guilty of contempt of court, he was sentenced to two weeks' imprisonment by this Court. This Court observed as under : (SCC pp. 423-24 & 427, paras 1-2 & 14) "1. The stream of administration of justice has to remain unpolluted so that purity of court's atmosphere may give vitality to all the organs of the State. Polluters of judicial firmament are, therefore, required to be well taken care of to maintain the sublimity of court's environment; so also to enable it to administer justice fairly and to the satisfaction of all concerned.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 302 - B L Hansaria - Full Document
1   2 3 Next