Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.22 seconds)Rajinder Kaur vs Punjab State & Anr on 8 August, 1986
10) In Tejinder Kaur v. State of Punjab and another (CWP No.8120 of 2016
Binny Ltd. & Anr vs V. Sadasivan & Ors on 8 August, 2005
12) Binny Ltd. & Anr. Vs. V. Sadasivan & Ors. (2005) 6 SCC 657 holds that
public policy principles or administrative law principles do not apply to private
employment.
Shri Naresh Kumar vs Shri Hiroshi Maniwa & Ors on 5 November, 2015
14) The Hon'ble High Court in a judgment authored by the Hon'ble MR.
JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA in CS(OS) No. 393/2010 entitled SHRI NARESH
KUMAR v. SHRI HIROSHI MANIWA & ORS has summed up :
S. S. Shetty vs Bharat Nidhi, Ltd on 17 September, 1957
"12. I have already stated above that even presuming there was breach of
contract, at best reasonable damages can be granted and once there is a
clause for termination of services by one month's notice, it can only be one
month's notice which can be treated as reasonable damages inasmuch as
parties understood the period for obtaining of an alternative employment as a
one month's notice period-vide SS Shetty's case (supra)"
Ge Capital Transportation Financial ... vs Shri Tarun Bhargava on 20 March, 2012
In GE Capital Transportation Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Shri Tarun
Bhargava (RFA No.294/2004 decided on 20.3.2012. An S.L.P. against this
judgment has been dismissed by the Supreme Court on 3.8.2012 in S.L.P.
No.21723/2012.) it has been held :