Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.16 seconds)
The Special Tahsildar (La) vs R.Srinivasan on 6 July, 2009 cites

The Special Tahsildar (La), Krishna ... vs Rathinareddi on 13 March, 2003

9. It is also to be seen that it is not the case of the appellant that Ex.A9 land is far away from the acquired lands. While fixing the valuation, the Court has to sit in the armchair of the willing seller and purchaser and decide the valuation. While fixing the valuation on the basis of comparable sale transaction, the transaction fetching the maximum price and most advantageous to the claimants have to be taken into consideration. It has been held by Hon'ble Division Bench in 2003 1 MLJ 781 (The Special Tahsildar (LA), Krishna Water Supply Project Unit-3, Tiruvallur vs. Rathinareddi), that while fixing the valuation, the value beneficial to the claimants should be taken into consideration. Therefore, taking into consideration of the above said facts, Ex.A9 will have to be taken into consideration.
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 5 - M Chockalingam - Full Document
1