Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.62 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 11 in The Delhi Electricity Reform Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
Federal Bank Ltd vs Sagar Thomas & Ors on 26 September, 2003
"18. From the decisions referred to above, the position
that emerges is that a writ petition under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India may be maintainable against
Flection Commission, India vs Saka Venkata Subba Raounion Of ... on 27 February, 1953
44. Within a couple of years of the framing of the
Constitution, this Court remarked in Election Commission of
India v. Saka Venkata Rao [Election Commission of
India v. Saka Venkata Rao, AIR 1953 SC 210] that
administrative law in India has been shaped in the English
mould. Power to issue writ or any order of direction for
"any other purpose" has been held to be included in Article
226 of the Constitution with a view apparently to place all
the High Courts in this country in somewhat the same
position as the Court of the King's Bench in England. It is
for this reason ordinary "private law remedies" are not
enforceable through extraordinary writ jurisdiction, even
though brought against public authorities
(see Administrative Law, 8th Edn., H.W.R. Wade and C.F.
Forsyth, p. 656). In a number of decisions, this Court has
held that contractual and commercial obligations are
enforceable only by ordinary action and not by judicial
review.
All India Idbi Officers Association ... vs Union Of India & Ors. on 17 December, 2018
63. Similarly, issues have been brought before this Court on multiple
occasions, whereby a previously Government owned entity was
subsequently subjected to disinvestment which has been dealt with by
different Courts at length, thereby, analysing whether the same would be
amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High Courts. A Division Bench of
the Bombay High Court in case titled IDBI Officers
Association v. Union of India, 2022 SCC OnLine Bom 2693, held as
follows:
G. Bassi Reddy vs International Crops Research Instt. & ... on 14 February, 2003
95. Having noted G. Bassi Reddy (supra), we move on
to consider Federal Bank v. Sagar Thomas103 which followed
within a few months of the former decision.
The Calcutta Gas Company (Proprietary) ... vs The State Of West Bengal And Others on 5 February, 1962
94. We may, at this stage, take notice of certain important
observations made by the Court after considering the
decisions in Calcutta Gas Co. (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of
W.B.98, Praga Tools Corpn. v. C.A.
Imanual99, Andi MuktaSadguru S.M.V.S.S.J.M.S.
Trust v. V.R. Rudani100, VST Industries Ltd. v. Workers'
Union101 and Sohan Lal v. Union of India102. The
observations read thus:
Praga Tools Corporation vs Shri C. A. Imanual & Ors on 19 February, 1969
94. We may, at this stage, take notice of certain important
observations made by the Court after considering the
decisions in Calcutta Gas Co. (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of
W.B.98, Praga Tools Corpn. v. C.A.
Imanual99, Andi MuktaSadguru S.M.V.S.S.J.M.S.
Trust v. V.R. Rudani100, VST Industries Ltd. v. Workers'
Union101 and Sohan Lal v. Union of India102. The
observations read thus:
Vst Industries Ltd vs Vst Industries Workers Union & Anr on 7 December, 2000
94. We may, at this stage, take notice of certain important
observations made by the Court after considering the
decisions in Calcutta Gas Co. (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of
W.B.98, Praga Tools Corpn. v. C.A.
Imanual99, Andi MuktaSadguru S.M.V.S.S.J.M.S.
Trust v. V.R. Rudani100, VST Industries Ltd. v. Workers'
Union101 and Sohan Lal v. Union of India102. The
observations read thus: