Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.27 seconds)Sardar Mohar Singh Throughpower Of ... vs Mangilal @ Mangtya on 15 January, 1997
8. On the side of the petitioners reliance is placed on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court Sardar Mohar Singh through power of attorney holder, Manjit Singh Vs. Mangilal Alias Mangtya (1997) 9 Supreme Court Cases 217 at page 218 wherein it is held that;
Swami Nath vs The S.D.O. Machhlishahr, Dist. Jaunpur ... on 12 March, 1958
10. He also seeks in aid of the decision in Shambhu Nath Vs. Dist. Judge, Mirzapur and Ors. AIR 2006 Allahabad 183 at page 184 wherein it is among other things held thus;
B.K. Jinnah vs K.P. Krishnan on 13 August, 1993
11. Furthermore on the side of revision petitioners the decision N.K. Jinnah Vs. K.P. Krishnan (2006) 2 M.L.J. 350 at page 353 and 354 wherein it is inter-alia held as follows;
Niyamat Ali Molla vs Sonargon Housing Co-Operative Society ... on 12 October, 2007
12. Also the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court Niyamat Ali Molla Vs. Sonargon HSG Coop. Society Ltd. & Ors. 2007 SAR (Civil) 929 at page 937 wherein it is observed as follows;
Ramankutty Gupta vs Avara on 3 February, 1994
16. At this stage, this Court in the interest of justice recalls the observation of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the decision RamanKutty Guptan Vs. Avara AIR 1994 Supreme Court 1699 at page 1700 wherein it is held as follows:
V.S. Palanichamy Chettiar Firm vs C. Alagappan & Another on 3 February, 1999
17. Continuing further this Court cites the decision V.S. Palanichamy Chettiar Firm Vs. C. Alagappan and another AIR 1999 Supreme Court 918 wherein it is laid down as follows;
Maruti Vishnu Kshirsagar vs Bapu Keshav Jadhav on 17 December, 1969
In the decision Maruti Vishnu Kshirsagar Vs. Bapu Keshav Jadhav AIR 1970 Bombay 398 it is among other things held that;
Hungerford Investment Trust Limited ... vs Haridas Mundhra & Others on 9 March, 1972
21. It is not out of place for this Court to point out the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd. Vs. Haridas Mundhra and others AIR 1972 Supreme Court 1826 at page 1827 wherein it is held that, 'as the Court passing a decree retains control over the decree even after the decree has been passed it can entertain the application for recession of the decree etc.' Moreover, in the aforesaid decision at para 25 it is held as follows;