Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.18 seconds)The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
Ashok Kumar Pandey & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 9 May, 2008
20. A perusal of the notification, dated 19.02.2024 makes
it clear that the entire schedule of selection was already
stated, wherein the preliminary examination was supposed
to be held in the month of June and the mains
examinations were scheduled to be held in September and
October, 2024. When once the schedule of selection
process has been set out in the notification, the question of
postponing the main examination, which is scheduled to
be held on 21.10.2024 would not arise and stalling the
examination, which is scheduled to be held in just two
days, would cause more inconvenience to several
thousands of students who are likely to attend
examinations and this Court takes a judicial note of the
fact that the Public Service Commission has issued
notification way back in the year, 2022 and in spite of
several attempts being made to conduct the selections,
they have ended up in disputes and finally the preliminary
::21:: AKS,J & LNA,J
wa_1188 & 1190 of 2024
examination was conducted in the month of June, 2024,
and that the next process of selection is conducting main
examination which is scheduled to be held on 21.10.2024
and we are of the considered opinion that this Court is not
inclined to postpone the main examinations which are
scheduled to be held on 21.10.2024 onwards. Insofar as
the appellants in W.A.No.1188 of 2024, they have
challenged the Notification, dated 19.02.2024 on the
ground that the Telangana Public Service Commission,
Hyderabad, could not have cancelled its earlier Notification
and issued fresh notification. To this contention, the
appellants having participated in the preliminary
examination and in the selection process, and also having
been unsuccessful in the selection, they cannot turn
around and challenge the Notification dt.19-02-2024. If
the appellants are aggrieved by the issuance of fresh
notification dt.19-02-2024, they could not have challenged
the notification after the results of the preliminary
examination have been published. Therefore, the
::22:: AKS,J & LNA,J
wa_1188 & 1190 of 2024
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Ashok
Kumar v. State of Bihar 1 would definitely attract in this
case since it was held in the said judgment that the
persons who have participated in the selection process
cannot turn around and challenge the very same selection.
The Biological Diversity Act, 2002
1