Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.26 seconds)

Sanjit Kumar @ Sanjeet Kumar Jha vs The State Of Bihar on 7 July, 2020

8. With regard to the judgment in the case of Sujit Kumar Jha (supra), wherein, relief was granted to the petitioner, but the factual matrix is slightly different, as in the said case, during the period of posting of the petitioner, a video went viral on social media regarding a quarrel that took place between prisoners on 30.08.2017. However, in the present case, the situation is quite different, as it is indicated in the charge memo that earlier during two consecutive raids dated 17.06.2018 and 09.07.2018, the District Administration found 10 mobile phones, scissor, knife, mobile charger, and a huge quantity of contraband articles on 17.06.2018, whereas 2 mobile phones and other contraband articles were seized on 09.07.2018. Patna High Court CWJC No.4825 of 2022 dt.20-01-2026
Patna High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Punjab National Bank And Ors.The Chief ... vs Sh. Kunj Behari Misra, Sh. Shanti Prasad ... on 19 August, 1998

13. In the present case, the disagreement memo, i.e., the second show-cause notice dated 17.05.2021, assigns tentative reasons for such disagreement, and the delinquent officer was given an opportunity to represent. The delinquent officer replied to the show-cause notice, and only thereafter, the final order was passed. Therefore, this Court is of the firm view that the ratio laid down in the case Punjab National Bank & Ors. (supra), as mentioned in it's para 19 quoted above, has been duly followed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 929 - Full Document
1