Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.50 seconds)Section 4 in The Prisoners Act, 1900 [Entire Act]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Inder Mohan Lal vs Secretary, Delhi Administration And ... on 21 December, 1978
In this context I may profitably refer to the decision
rendered in the case of Inder Singh and Anr. v. The State (Delhi
Administration) 1978 SCC (Cri) 564 wherein their Lordships
emphasized on rehabilitation and quoted a passage from Lewis
Moore with approval. The said passage reads as under :
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Rakesh Shende vs State Of Chhattisgarh 49 Acqa/238/2010 ... on 13 March, 2018
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioners are
languishing in jail since 2017 and while considering their conduct in
jail, the Jail Authorities have referred their application for grant of
parole, but, the same has been dismissed by the Competent
Authority / District Magistrate without any application of mind and
only on the basis of objection raised by the Police Authorities.
Whereas they have not shown any reasonable ground with regard
to their apprehension. It is further submitted that sureties are ready
to keep petitioners in their control and one independent witness
namely; Shashi Patre has stated no objection for grant of parole to
the petitioners despite that District Magistrate, Bilaspur has
dismissed the application without considering the object of granting
parole to jail inmates and as has been observed by Supreme Court
in various cases and also the observations of Coordinate Bench of
this Court in the matter of Rakesh Shende v. State of
Chhattisgarh & others 1, wherein it has been specifically held that
"all aspects of criminal justice fall under the umbrella of Articles 14,
19 and 21 of the Constitution of India" and, therefore, impugned
order deserves to be set aside and the petition may be allowed.