Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.28 seconds)
Om Prakash Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 December, 2025 cites

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan And Ors. vs Dr. R.K. Shahstri And Anr. on 19 July, 2005

7. It is further evident from perusal of the return filed by the State that a fresh advertisement on 23.06.2025 was issued. Written test as well as interview have already been conducted, and the merit list is under process or preparation. Therefore, in such circumstances, no interference with the impugned orders is warranted. The decisions which are being relied upon by the petitioner are of no assistance to him inasmuch as the decision of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan and others v. Dr. R.K. Shashtri and another reported in 2005 (4) MPHT 352 Signature Not Verified Signed by: VARSHA CHOURASIYA Signing time: 04-12-2025 14:34:26 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:62537 5 WP-39111-2025 as well as decision of High Court of Chhattisgarh passed in WPS No.217/2015 in the case of Prakash Narayan Tiwari v. State of Chhattisgarh and others pertain to cases of suspension.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 50 - Full Document

Prakash Narayan Tiwari vs The State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors on 7 July, 2015

7. It is further evident from perusal of the return filed by the State that a fresh advertisement on 23.06.2025 was issued. Written test as well as interview have already been conducted, and the merit list is under process or preparation. Therefore, in such circumstances, no interference with the impugned orders is warranted. The decisions which are being relied upon by the petitioner are of no assistance to him inasmuch as the decision of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan and others v. Dr. R.K. Shashtri and another reported in 2005 (4) MPHT 352 Signature Not Verified Signed by: VARSHA CHOURASIYA Signing time: 04-12-2025 14:34:26 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:62537 5 WP-39111-2025 as well as decision of High Court of Chhattisgarh passed in WPS No.217/2015 in the case of Prakash Narayan Tiwari v. State of Chhattisgarh and others pertain to cases of suspension.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 4 - P K Mishra - Full Document

U.O.I. Thr. Govt. Of Pondicherry & Anr vs V. Ramakrishnan & Ors on 7 October, 2005

6. A perusal of the impugned order dated 27.05.2025 (Annexure P/13) on the face of it reflects that the same is not stigmatic. No allegation on the same order has been levelled, and the petitioner was only repatriated back to his parent department. Such an order of repatriation in the absence of any mala fide allegation is not available to challenge inasmuch as a deputationist cannot claim posting on deputation as a matter of right. (Please see: Union of India through Govt. of Pondicherry and another Vs. V. Ramakrishnan and others reported in (2005) 8 SCC 394, and Kunal Nandu v. Union of India reported in AIR 2000 SC 2076)
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 254 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Kunal Nanda vs Union Of India & Anr on 24 April, 2000

6. A perusal of the impugned order dated 27.05.2025 (Annexure P/13) on the face of it reflects that the same is not stigmatic. No allegation on the same order has been levelled, and the petitioner was only repatriated back to his parent department. Such an order of repatriation in the absence of any mala fide allegation is not available to challenge inasmuch as a deputationist cannot claim posting on deputation as a matter of right. (Please see: Union of India through Govt. of Pondicherry and another Vs. V. Ramakrishnan and others reported in (2005) 8 SCC 394, and Kunal Nandu v. Union of India reported in AIR 2000 SC 2076)
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 221 - D Raju - Full Document
1