Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.26 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 227 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Chandra Babu @ Moses vs State Tr.Insp.Of Police & Ors on 7 July, 2015
In Chandra Babu alias Moses v. State and
others (2015) 8 SCC 774 and Sanjaysinh Ramrao
Chavan v. Dattatray Gulabrao Phalke and
others (2015) 3 SCC 123, the Hon'ble Supreme
Court has been pleased to hold that revisional
jurisdiction should be exercised cautiously and
normally, a revisional jurisdiction should be exercised
on a question of law and the finding of the court is
not to be interfered unless the same is shown to be
CR No:359/2017 Page 20 of 21 D.O.J.10.10.2018
Vijay Singh Vs. The State
CR No:359/2017
perverse or untenable in law or is grossly erroneous
or glaringly unreasonable or where the decision is
based on no material or where the material facts are
wholly ignored or where the judicial discretion is
exercised arbitrarily or capriciously.
Murlidhar Dayandeo Kesekar vs Vishwanath Pandu Barde & Anr on 22 February, 1995
PP
for the State has contended that the decision
Murlidhar Dayandeo Kesekar Vs. Vishwanath
Pandu Barde & Anr (Supra) as relied by the
accused persons is no help to them as it is in the
civil proceedings it shall be determined that whether
transfer of the property in favour of the complainant
was valid or not.
Sanjaysinh Ramrao Chavan vs Dattatray Gulabrao Phalke & Anr on 16 January, 2015
In Chandra Babu alias Moses v. State and
others (2015) 8 SCC 774 and Sanjaysinh Ramrao
Chavan v. Dattatray Gulabrao Phalke and
others (2015) 3 SCC 123, the Hon'ble Supreme
Court has been pleased to hold that revisional
jurisdiction should be exercised cautiously and
normally, a revisional jurisdiction should be exercised
on a question of law and the finding of the court is
not to be interfered unless the same is shown to be
CR No:359/2017 Page 20 of 21 D.O.J.10.10.2018
Vijay Singh Vs. The State
CR No:359/2017
perverse or untenable in law or is grossly erroneous
or glaringly unreasonable or where the decision is
based on no material or where the material facts are
wholly ignored or where the judicial discretion is
exercised arbitrarily or capriciously.