Ardesir Bejonji Surti vs Syed Sirdar Ali Khan And Ors. on 13 October, 1908
The same view is taken in Bombay; vile Ardesir Bejonji Surti v. Syed Sirdar Ali Khan 4 Ind. Cas. 891 : 33 B. 610 : 10 Bom.L.R. 1146.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.17 seconds)Mulraj Khatau vs Vishvanath Prabhuram Vaidya on 21 November, 1912
The decision of the Judicial Committee in Mulraj Khatau v. Vishwanath Prabhuram Vaidya 17 Ind. Cas. 627 : 37 B 198 : (1912) M.W.N. 1247 : 12 M.L.T. 652 : 11 A.L.J. 7 : 24 M.L.J. 60 : 17 C.W.N. 209 : 15 Bom. L.R. 9 : 17 C.L.J. 162 : 40 I.A. 24 (P.C.), although the language of the Committee suggests that the assignments in that case may not have been by way of mortgage, has been understood in the Fall Bench in this Court as holding that a mortgage operates as a transfer of the right of action in the chose-in-action.
Section 134 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
1