Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.31 seconds)

Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd.,Madhya ... vs D. P. Dube, Sales Tax Officer, Bhopal ... on 21 December, 1962

II, where the learned author has summarized The proposition emerging from the decided cases on the question of alternative remedies. The petitioner argued that the order passed by the ITO is contrary to law or is without authority of law and, therefore, the writ petition against the said order is maintainable. It was also urged that in respect of writ of certiorari, there is no rule that it will lie only if there is no adequate alternate remedy. The petitioner also relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh [1958] AIR 1958 SC 86; [1958] SCR 595 and Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd. v. Dube, Sales Tax Officer (No. 2) . In the later decision, which was under the provisions of the Sales Tax Act, the Supreme Court observed (p. 414 of 14 STC) :
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 47 - J C Shah - Full Document

The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Mohammad Nooh on 30 September, 1957

II, where the learned author has summarized The proposition emerging from the decided cases on the question of alternative remedies. The petitioner argued that the order passed by the ITO is contrary to law or is without authority of law and, therefore, the writ petition against the said order is maintainable. It was also urged that in respect of writ of certiorari, there is no rule that it will lie only if there is no adequate alternate remedy. The petitioner also relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh [1958] AIR 1958 SC 86; [1958] SCR 595 and Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd. v. Dube, Sales Tax Officer (No. 2) . In the later decision, which was under the provisions of the Sales Tax Act, the Supreme Court observed (p. 414 of 14 STC) :
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 1128 - Full Document
1