Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.62 seconds)Section 392 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Visveswaran vs State Rep. By S.D.M on 28 April, 2003
In Visveswaran v. State it
was held:
Ajmer Singh vs State Of Haryana on 15 February, 2010
22. The another contention raised on behalf of the appellant/accused
that though many public persons were present at the spot but none
has been made a witness by the prosecution, cannot be accepted in
view of the decision rendered by the Apex Court in Ajmer Singh
vs. State of Haryana reported in 2010 (2) SCR 785, which reads as
under:-
Kalpnath Rai vs State (Through Cbi) on 6 November, 1997
In
Crl.A. 1087/2012 Page 11 of 12
Kalpnath Rai Vs. State (through CBI) reported in AIR 1998 SC
201, it was observed by the Apex Court that :