Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.31 seconds)
Shri Ramanand Laximidhar Kunde And Anr. vs Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... on 19 August, 1993
cites
Section 18 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Ram Chandra Palai And Others vs The State Of Orissa And Others on 20 January, 1956
In our view with great respect we are unable to agree with the decision of the Allahabad High Court in Babua Ram and others v. State of Uttar Pradesh, , and we accept and fall in line with the decision of the Division Bench in Ram Loguri and others v. State of Orissa, 1992 L.A.C.C. Orissa 458 and decision of Smt. Sumita Guller & others v. State of Himachal Pradesh, A.I.R. 1992 H.P. 93. Viewed thus therefore it must be held that irrespective of protest or no protest, persons interesed are entitled to get compensation re-determined when applications are filed within the limitation period prescribed in section 28-A. Question No. 1 set out earlier is answered accordingly.