Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.56 seconds)
Mohammad Idreesh vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 7 March, 2024 cites

Prasanta Kumar Sarkar vs Ashis Chatterjee & Anr on 29 October, 2010

with an order passed by the High Court granting or rejecting bail to the accused. However, it is equally incumbent upon the High Court to exercise its discretion judiciously, cautiously and strictly in compliance with the basic principles laid down in a plethora of decisions of this Court on the point. It is well settled that, among other circumstances, the factors to be borne in mind while considering an application for bail are:
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 3062 - D K Jain - Full Document

Brajesh Choubey vs State Of Chhattisgarh 5 Mcrc/154/2019 ... on 9 January, 2019

4. Mr. Javed Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated. As per the prosecution, the petitioner had rented out the godown to Mohit Bansal and the petitioner cannot be held liable for the acts of the tenant. The accused Mohit Bansal has named the petitioner to save himself. Hence, he prayed that the present petition be allowed and the petitioner be released on bail. He has relied upon the judgment of this Court in Brajesh ::: Downloaded on - 07/03/2024 20:32:37 :::CIS 6 Kumar Vs. State, Cr.MP(M) No. 2369 of 2023, decided on 29.12.2023 in support of his submission.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1