Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.39 seconds)
Mahesh Rajak ( Dar ) vs Gaurav And Ors. ( Fir No.465/21, Ps. ... on 30 May, 2024 cites

Mahesh Kumar Yaggik vs State Of Chhattisgarh 30 Wpl/118/2019 ... on 14 May, 2019

13. In the present case, the Investigating Officer had filed the DAR containing FIR, Charge sheet, site plan, MLC etc. Charge sheet has been filed against the respondent no.1. PW1 Mahesh Rajak had categorically deposed the fact about the occurrence of the accident due to rash and negligent driving of the Respondent No.1. No other version of MACT No. 38/22 6/22 Mahesh Rajak vs. Gaurav and ors.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 7 - P S Koshy - Full Document

Raj Kumar vs Ajay Kumar & Anr on 18 October, 2010

case of person engaged in some kind of desk work in an office, the loss of leg may not have same effect. The loss of a leg (or for that matter the loss of any limb) to any one is bound to have very traumatic effects on one's personal, family or social life but the loss of one of the legs to a person working in an office would not interfere with his work/earning capacity in the same degree as in the case of marginal farmer or a cycle rickshaw-puller. Reference was also made of the case "Raj Kumar Vs. Ajay Kumar (2011) 1 SCC 343".
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 3811 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Mohan Soni vs Ram Avtar Tomar & Ors on 10 January, 2012

31. It was held in the case of "Mohan Soni Vs. Ram Avtar Tomar & Ors. I (2012) ACC 1 (SC)" that in the context of loss of future earning, any physical disability resulting from an accident has to be judged with reference to the nature of work being performed by the person suffering the disability. This is the basic premise and once that is grasped, it clearly follows that the same injury or loss may affect two different persons in different ways. Take the case of a marginal farmer who does his cultivation work himself and ploughs his land with his own two hands, the loss of one of the legs to the marginal farmer would be the end of the road in so far his earning capacity is concerned.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 314 - A Alam - Full Document
1   2 Next