Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.61 seconds)
One Judgment Titled As State Of Madhya ... vs . Ram on 11 July, 2011 cites

State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors. vs Ram Prakash Sharma And Ors. on 7 October, 1988

In present case, it has been admitted by complainant that one civil litigation between him and accused is pending in Tis Hazari Courts and he FIR No. 221/99 14/18 has attributed assault by accused on account of this reason only. Keeping in view caution as observed by Hon'ble High Court of MP in case titled as State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ram Prakash and Others ( supra), the same motive may be imputed to complainant also for implicating accused in present case and that too in the circumstances when complainant in his cross examination has stated that it is correct that he did not get his statement recorded at hospital as he wanted to lodge a complaint against accused persons after consulting his family members. It may be that on account of pending litigation, complainant at behest of his family members might have initiated criminal proceedings against accused persons by way of present FIR.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 33 - Full Document

Rehmat vs The State Haryana on 3 September, 1996

Possibility of falsely implicating accused persons cannot be ruled out in view of the fact that complainant while getting himself medically examined has not disclosed to Dr. concerned name of assailants despite he being aware of their names. Accused have filed judgment in case titled as Rehmat Vs. State of Haryana 1996 (3) RCR 588. In this case, Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has observed that - Complainant examined by doctor, but he did not disclose name of accused to doctor - ordinarily, in a FIR No. 221/99 15/18 medico­legal case, the doctor is supposed to write down history of the injured, but in the instant case medical papers did not indicate name of assailant­ accused acquitted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 70 - S P Kurdukar - Full Document
1