Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.37 seconds)Smt. Rukmani Devi And Ors. vs Narendra Lal Gupta on 13 September, 1984
6. The judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Smt. Rukmani
Devi and Ors vs. Narendra Lal Gupta reported in 1985 1 SCC 144, it is held
thus:
Ashok Kumar Singhal And Ors vs State Of M.P. And Anr on 19 February, 1996
In the case of Ashok Kumar Singhal and Ors vs. State of M.P.
And another, reported in 1996 9 SCC 48, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held
thus:
Section 63 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Surinder Kumar And Ors. vs Gian Chand And Ors. on 24 September, 1957
In Surinder Kumar and Ors. v. Gian Chand and Ors.
1958 SCR 548 this Court allowed an application for
admission of additional evidence to place the probate of
the will on record. The Court after allowing the
application held that since will has been admitted to
probate any infirmity in the matter of probate of the will
due to the want of proper attestation of the will as
required by Section 63(1)(c) of the Indian Succession
Act would be removed because the order admitting the
will to the probate will operate as a judgment in rem.
Therefore the High Court was perfectly justified in
6/13
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
S.A.No.643 of 2016
reversing the decision of the executing court directing
the respondent to lead evidence to prove the genuineness
of the will.”
1