Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.32 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 13 in Rajasthan Agricultural Credit Operations (Removal of Difficulties) Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
Eva Agro Feeds Private Limited vs Punjab National Bank on 6 September, 2023
In a recent decision by this Court in Eva Agro Feeds
Private Limited v. Punjab National Bank & Anr.
M/S. Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. vs The Excise And Taxation Officer Cum ... on 1 February, 2023
17. The learned counsel for the petitioner while replying to the
preliminary objections placed reliance upon the judgement dated
01.02.2023 passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.
5393/2010, M/S Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. v. The Excise and
Taxation Officer-Cum-Assessing Authority & Ors., wherein
the Hon'ble Apex Court held that the availability of alternate
remedy would not oust the writ jurisdiction of the High Court, if
there is non-compliance of statutory provisions.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
S Karthik vs N Subhash Chand Jain on 23 September, 2021
14. The learned counsels for the respondents while raising the
preliminary objections jointly placed reliance on the judgement
dated 23.09.2023 passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal
(D.B. SAW/556/2021 and 1 more have been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders)
(Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 06:54:08 AM)
[2023:RJ-JD:32072] (6 of 23) [CW-9986/2021]
No. 5920-5923/2021, S. Karthik & Ors. v. N. Subhash
Chand Jain & Ors., wherein the Court held that:
The Punjab Land Revenue Rules
Celir Llp vs Bafna Motors (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd. on 21 September, 2023
15. The learned counsel for the respondents while raising
preliminary objection further placed reliance upon the judgement
dated 21.09.2023 in Civil Appeal No. 5542-5543/2023, Celir
LLP v. Bafna Motors (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., wherein the
court held that:
K. Kumara Gupta vs Sri Markendaya And Sri Omkareswara ... on 18 February, 2022
In another decision by this Court in K. Kumara Gupta
v. Sri Markendaya and Sri Omkareswara Swamy
Temple & Ors. reported in (2022) 5 SCC 710, it was
held that repeated interferences with public auction would
frustrate the sanctity and purpose of holding auctions. The
relevant observations made in it are given below:-