Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)
Sandeep vs Indo Tibetan Boarder Police Force & Ors. on 29 November, 2021 cites

K M Priyanka vs Union Of India And Ors on 21 December, 2020

10. This Court in its judgment dated 21.12.2020 in K.M. Priyanka v. Union of India & Ors, W.P.(C) 10783/2020, has held that once no mala fide is attributed and the doctors of the Forces, who are well aware of the demands of duties of the Forces in the terrains in which the recruited personnel are required to work, have formed an opinion that a candidate is not medically fit for recruitment, the opinion of private or other government doctors to the contrary cannot be accepted.
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 12 - A Menon - Full Document

Pritlal Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh 9 Cra/377/2010 ... on 30 January, 2019

In Priti Yadav v. Union of India, W.P.(C) 3930/2020, in the context of medical test for recruitment in the Officer cadre of Indian Air Force, this Court held that fitness for serving requisite duties in the Air Force is a matter of opinion and if in the opinion of the authorities constituted under the Rules of the Indian Air Force (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules'), the petitioner is unfit, a report of a medical practitioner of another organization which does not intend to recruit the petitioner and which will not be affected by the medical unfitness of the petitioner, cannot be the basis for interfering with the assessment by the Indian Air Force. It was further held that medical opinion can vary from professional to professional and once the Rules Signature Not Verified Signed By:SHALOO BATRA Location: Signing Date:01.12.2021 18:06 W.P.(C) No.13456 /2021 Page 4 of 5 provide for finality and are found to have provided for a review to eliminate the possibility of human error, the finality has to be accepted, unless a case for interference is made out.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - R P Sharma - Full Document

Mr. Deepak Kumar Pal vs Staff Selection Commission on 15 February, 2013

8. The learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the judgment dated 21.05.2018 of this Court passed in Deepak Pahal vs. Staff Selection Commission, W.P.(C) No. 6753/2017 and Vijay Malik vs. Staff Selection Commission, W.P.(C) No. 6575/2017, to submit that the petitioner is ready and willing to be subjected to the medical examination by an Army hospital.
Central Information Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1