Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.26 seconds)

Magan Bihari Lal vs State Of Punjab on 15 February, 1977

Learned counsel for the revision-petitioner has pressed into service various authorities, first being Magan Bihari Lal vs. The State of Punjab, 1977 AIR (SC) 1091 wherein it was observed that it is unsafe to base a conviction solely on expert opinion without substantial corroboration. This type of evidence, being opinion evidence, is by its very nature, weak and infirm and cannot or itself form the basis for a conviction.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 236 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Babu Lal vs Kamla Devi & Anr on 30 March, 2009

complainant- Ram Giri to be owner in possession of suit land and impugned decree dated 20.12.1991 passed in civil suit No.833 of 1991 titled as 'Babu Lal vs. Kamla' and mutation No.613 sanctioned on the basis thereof illegal, null & void and not binding on the right of the complainant, after observing that impugned decree is outcome of fraud by way of impersonation and is not binding upon rights of plaintiff - complainant. This is a very important piece of evidence for the complainant to prove her case.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - V Kothari - Full Document
1