Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.69 seconds)State Of Haryana & Ors vs Amar Nath Bansal on 15 January, 1997
6. After completion of PE, all the incriminating evidence
SC No. 485/2021 State Vs. Aman Bansal Page no. 5 of 17
were put to accused and his statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.
was recorded. Accused deposed that he never married with
deceased nor demanded money from family members of
deceased. Accused claimed that deceased was already married
with one Manjeet but had not taken divorce from him and the
deceased committed suicide because she was frustrated and under
depression due to loss of job during Covid lock down. Accused
did not led any evidence in his defence.
Section 306 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 304B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal vs State Of Gujarat on 9 September, 2013
In Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal vs. State of Gujarat (2013) 10 SCC 48,
this Court, with reference to Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act,
1872, while observing that the criminal law amendment bringing forth this
provision was necessitated to meet the social challenge of saving the
married woman from being ill-treated or forcing to commit suicide by the
husband or his relatives demanding dowry, it was underlined that the burden
of proving the preconditions permitting the presumption as ingrained
therein, squarely and singularly lay on the prosecution. That the prosecution
as well has to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased had
committed suicide on being abetted by the person charged under Section
306 IPC, was emphasised."