Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.55 seconds)Man Kaur(Dead)By Lrs vs Hartar Singh Sangha on 5 October, 2010
"6.Parties to a suit or proceeding are
permitted to give evidence within the limits
prescribed by S.5 of the Indian Evidence Act,
1872. A power of Attorney holder of a party
can be examined as a witness like any other
witness, if he is competent in law to testify
to the existence or non existence of any fact
in issue in any suit or proceeding or of such
other facts as are declared to be relevant
under the provisions of the Evidence Act, if
such facts are within his personal
knowledge, but he can not appear as a
witness in the capacity of that party i.e.
himself as the plaintiff or the defendant.
When and to what extent a power of
attorney holder could give evidence is
explained by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Man
Kaur vs Hartar Singh Sangha"
Section 467 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
R Narasimha vs S P Sridhar on 30 August, 2013
34. Further, in case of Narasimha vs S.P. Sridhar, ILR 2014
Kar.84, it has been held by his lordship as under :
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani & Anr vs Indusind Bank Ltd. & Ors on 6 December, 2004
33. Further, para 13 of judgment of Nagarathnamurthy's
case following the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in In
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani vs Indusind Bank Limited, 2005 (2)
SCC, 217, has held as under :