Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.21 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 7 in The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
S. Sundara Kumar vs State Represented By The Inspector Of ... on 13 January, 2021
Similarly in case of Anil Kumar (Supra) the Hon'ble Supreme Court
in paragraph 4, & 5 observed as under:-
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 374 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 401 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 197 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 324 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Dinesh Kumar Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh 46 Wps/2771/2019 ... on 11 April, 2019
2009
(4) C.G.L.J. 496), (Ghasiram @ Bulthu Vs. State of C.G.
2016 (1) C.G.L.J. 159), (Dhanesh Kumar Sahu Vs. State of
C.G. 2006 (3) C.G.L.J. 137). Placing reliance on the above
judgments, Shri Patankar submits that ends of justice would be
served if the sentence awarded to the applicant is reduced to
sentence already served/undergone by him by enhancing the
fne amount. On the other hands Shri Ashish Tiwari learned
counsel for the state submitted that both the courts below have
found the applicant guilty under section 409 of IPC. The
applicant has embezzled Rs.98.763/- of government money.
Both the courts below were justifed in convicting him and
awarding sentence after due appreciation of evidence, therefore
no leniency may be shown towards the applicant and the
revision deserves to be dismissed.