Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.33 seconds)

B.C. Chaturvedi vs Union Of India And Ors on 1 November, 1995

In this regard, the scope of judicial review into a decision making process undertaken in a departmental inquiry and the principle to be followed for appreciating a finding of the Enquiry Officer is laid down in the case of B.C. Chaturvedi Vs. Union of India, 1995(6) SCC 749; Union of India Vs. B.K. Shrivastava, AIR 1998 SC 300; and, Apparel Export Promotion Council Vs. A.K. Chopra, 1991 (1) LLJ 962, may be taken note of. It has been consistently held by the Supreme Court in various cases that a finding of guilt based on due appreciation of the evidence cannot be interfered with until 6 Writ Petition No : 14939 of 2006(S) Vinod Kumar Shukla Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others.
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 2256 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs B.K. Srivastava on 24 October, 1997

In this regard, the scope of judicial review into a decision making process undertaken in a departmental inquiry and the principle to be followed for appreciating a finding of the Enquiry Officer is laid down in the case of B.C. Chaturvedi Vs. Union of India, 1995(6) SCC 749; Union of India Vs. B.K. Shrivastava, AIR 1998 SC 300; and, Apparel Export Promotion Council Vs. A.K. Chopra, 1991 (1) LLJ 962, may be taken note of. It has been consistently held by the Supreme Court in various cases that a finding of guilt based on due appreciation of the evidence cannot be interfered with until 6 Writ Petition No : 14939 of 2006(S) Vinod Kumar Shukla Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 32 - D P Wadhwa - Full Document

Apparel Export Promotion Council vs A.K. Chopra on 20 January, 1999

In this regard, the scope of judicial review into a decision making process undertaken in a departmental inquiry and the principle to be followed for appreciating a finding of the Enquiry Officer is laid down in the case of B.C. Chaturvedi Vs. Union of India, 1995(6) SCC 749; Union of India Vs. B.K. Shrivastava, AIR 1998 SC 300; and, Apparel Export Promotion Council Vs. A.K. Chopra, 1991 (1) LLJ 962, may be taken note of. It has been consistently held by the Supreme Court in various cases that a finding of guilt based on due appreciation of the evidence cannot be interfered with until 6 Writ Petition No : 14939 of 2006(S) Vinod Kumar Shukla Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 566 - V N Khare - Full Document
1