Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 39 (0.39 seconds)Section 95 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 153A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 295 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The State Of Mysore vs Henry Rodrigues And Anr. on 11 October, 1961
56. Our endeavour would get further factual support if we analyse briefly the fact of three cases relied on by Mr. Roy for the State namely Khalil Ahmed v. State, , the case of Kali Charan Sharma v. Emperor, and the case of the State of Mysore v. Henry Rodrigues and Anr., reported in 1962(2) Cri LJ page 564.
Gopal Vinayak Godse vs The Union Of India And Ors. on 6 August, 1969
Here, in this context we once again reiterate the observation of the Special Bench recorded in the case of Gopal Vinayak (supra) at para 64 that consequence of the writing must be considered taking into consideration the class of readers for whom the book is primarily meant as also the state of feeling between the different class and communities at the relevant time and at the same breath, we want to reiterate the observation of Hon'ble Justice Vivian Bose given in Bhagwati Charan Shukla (supra), where it was held that the effect of the words must be judged from the standards of a reasonable, strong minded, firm and courageous men and not those of weak and vacillating mind nor all those who scent danger in every hostile point of view.
Section 96 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Kali Charan Sharma vs Emperor on 24 February, 1927
56. Our endeavour would get further factual support if we analyse briefly the fact of three cases relied on by Mr. Roy for the State namely Khalil Ahmed v. State, , the case of Kali Charan Sharma v. Emperor, and the case of the State of Mysore v. Henry Rodrigues and Anr., reported in 1962(2) Cri LJ page 564.
Khalil Ahmad vs State Of U.P. on 12 May, 1961
56. Our endeavour would get further factual support if we analyse briefly the fact of three cases relied on by Mr. Roy for the State namely Khalil Ahmed v. State, , the case of Kali Charan Sharma v. Emperor, and the case of the State of Mysore v. Henry Rodrigues and Anr., reported in 1962(2) Cri LJ page 564.
Smt. S. R. Venkataraman vs Union Of India & Anr on 2 November, 1978
11.6. We need not elaborate on the decisions in Goverdhanlal Pitti (supra) and Smt. S.R. Venkataraman (supra) since dealt with in paragraphs 8.3 and 8.4 hereinbefore. The principles laid down therein are to be applied in the present case as would be necessary for our present purpose.