Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 39 (0.69 seconds)Section 3 in The National Security Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
Preventive Detention Act, 1950
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Godavari Shamrao Parulekar vs State Of Maharashtra And Others on 29 January, 1964
In
Godavari Shamrao Parulekar v. State of Maharashtra & Others
[1964] 6 SCR 446 where referring to several authorities
Wanchoo, J. speaking for the Court observed at page 452 of
the report that in those cases it was held by this Court
that where a person was detained in jail as an under-trial-
pris-
Dr. Ramakrishna Rawat vs District Magistrate, Jabalpur And Anr. on 11 October, 1974
(a) of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971
presupposed that on the date of the order of detention or in
the near future the person sought to be detained had or
would have freedom of action. If a person therefore was
serving a long term of imprisonment or was in jail custody
as an undertrial and there was no immediate or early
prospect of his being released on bail or otherwise, the
authority could not legitimately be satisfied on the basis
of his past history or antecedents that he was likely to
indulge in similar prejudicial activities after his release
in the distant or indefinite future. To the similar effect
are the observations in Dr. Ramakrishna Rawat v. District
Magistrate, Jabalpur and Another. [1975] 4 SCC 164 at 167
and 169.