Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)

T.R.F. Limited vs Commissioner Of Income Tax on 12 July, 2006

Once the Assessee is unable to recover the amount from his debtors, such non-recoverable receipts could appropriately be legally written off as bad debt by Assessee. This aspect has been examined by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of T.R.F. Ltd. vs CIT - [2010] 323 ITR 397 (SC) wherein it is held that after the amendment of Section 36(1 )(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 with effect from 1st April, 1989, in order to obtain a deduction in relation to bad debts, it is not necessary for the assessee to establish that the debt has in fact, become irrecoverable. It is enough if the bad debt is written off as irrecoverable in the accounts of the assessee. In the case of the assessee, it is undisputed that the sum of Rs.45,84,283/- has already been written off in the books of account.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 366 - M Y Eqbal - Full Document

Trf Ltd vs Commnr. Of Income Tax on 9 February, 2010

8.1 After perusing the aforesaid Ld. CIT(A)'s finding, we find that Ld. CIT(A) has referred and followed the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of TRF Ltd. vs. CIT (2010) 323 ITR 397 (SC) wherein it is held that after the amendment of Section 36(1)((vii) of the Income Tax At, 1961 with effect from 1st April, 1989, in order to obtain a deduction in relation to bad debts, it is not necessary for the assessee to establish that the debt has in fact, become irrecoverable. It is enough if the bad 5 debt is written off as irrecoverable in the accounts of the assessee. We further find that Ld. CIT(A) has rightly observed that it is undisputed that the sum of Rs. 45,84,283/- has already been written off in the books of account, hence, the AO was rightly directed to delete the addition of Rs. 45,84,283/-. In view of the above, we are of the view that Ld. CIT(A) has passed a well reasoned order which does not need any interference on our part, hence, we uphold the same and dismiss the ground raised by the Revenue.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 561 - Full Document
1