Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (1.19 seconds)
Barrister Prasad vs State Of U.P. And 12 Others on 27 April, 2023 cites

Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors on 12 November, 2013

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that a perusal of the application U/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant clearly discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, however, the Magistrate has erred in law in directing to proceed with the application as a complaint case, without taking into consideration the aforesaid facts. He further submits that in the application U/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. itself, it has been mentioned that the injured had suffered injuries, one being fracture in the thumb of left hand and the injury report has also been placed alongwith the said application U/s 156(3) Cr.P.C., which goes to show that the cognizable offence is made out against the applicant. The learned counsel for the applicant has contended with vehemence that the court below has passed the impugned order in a mechanical manner and has ignored the judgement of the Apex Court rendered in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of U.P. and others reported in 2014 (2) SCC 1.
Supreme Court of India Cites 71 - Cited by 18813 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1   2 Next