Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)
Kunal Bansal vs Punjab Public Service Commission And ... on 1 August, 2018 cites

Dr. M.C. Gupta And Ors. vs Dr. Arun Kumar Gupta And Ors. on 15 December, 1978

In case of Dr. M.C. Gupta and others Vs. Dr. Arun Kumar Gupta and others, 1979 (2) S.C.C 339 the Hon'ble Supreme Court was considering a controversy regarding selection made by the State Public Service Commission for two posts of Professors of Medicines in the State Medical Colleges. Having considered the matter, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had observed as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 53 - D A Desai - Full Document

Tileshwar Tiwari And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 28 January, 2010

In support of this contention, reliance has also been placed upon the Division Bench decision of Allahabad High Court in "Tileshwar Ram and another vs. State of U.P. and others", 1986(4) SLR 487; the judgment of the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in "P.Subbarao and others vs. Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, 17 of 21 ::: Downloaded on - 06-10-2018 22:52:57 ::: C.W.P. No. 14303 of 2018 (O&M) and '04' other connected cases -18- Hyderabad", AIR 1961 Andhra Pradesh 378 in support of the submission that the High Court exercising its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has no jurisdiction to interfere lightly with the internal affairs of the procedure and practice in conducting examination for recruitment into State service by the Commission.
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 2 - R Chandra - Full Document

P. Subbarao And Ors. vs Andhra Pradesh Public Service ... on 2 September, 1960

In that case if nature of assessee is given (clarified) then the answer may be correct for Option 'A' also as considered by the subject expert in case of the 'Company' and in that case 'D' i.e. 'all of the above' would also have been the correct answer. Once the expert has opined that there is a doubt in that question itself, that question has to be dropped for the sake of justice to all candidates and the actual competition is restricted to 'remaining questions only', which is equally fair to all the candidates. The various instances of other recruitments by respondent No. 1/Commission pointed by the petitioner, wherein in holding competitive examination for making the appointment on other posts in different departments, respondent No. 1/Commission has awarded marks to the candidates who have marked either of the two (02) correct options is not 18 of 21 ::: Downloaded on - 06-10-2018 22:52:57 ::: C.W.P. No. 14303 of 2018 (O&M) and '04' other connected cases -19- applicable on the facts of this case in view of the subject expert opinion referring to the doubt in the question, thus the said ground raised by the petitioner is considered and rejected.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 6 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1