Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.35 seconds)Section 6 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
M/S S.J. And S.P. Family Trust vs Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest ... on 18 May, 2018
With regard to providing a clear and cogent response to the Appellant, the Commission referred
to the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in J P Aggarwal v. Union of India (WP (C) no.
7232/2009 wherein it was held that:
Shri R. K. Agarwal vs Central Information Commission (Cic) on 6 April, 2009
The Commission also observed that the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the matter of R.K. Jain
v. CIC and Anr. in W.P.(C) 4152/2017 dated 10.10.2017 had held as under on the issue of power
of the Commission to impose penalty :
Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
In this context a reference was made to the Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in 2011 (8) SCC
497 (CBSE Vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay), wherein it was held as under:
The Indian Medical Council Act, 1956
Section 20 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Anand Bhushan vs R.A. Haritash on 29 March, 2012
5. The question whether the CIC had the discretion to restrict the penalty or whether
penalty as provided under Section 20 of the Act is mandatory, is no longer res integra.
The said question was considered by a Division Bench of this Court in Anand Bhushan v.
R.A. Haritash: ILR (2012) 4 Delhi 657 and the relevant extract of the said decision is set
out below....
Mujibur Rehman vs Central Information Commission on 28 April, 2009
Having heard both the parties and on perusal of the available records, the Commission at the
outset was appalled to learn about the callous and casual approach exhibited by the Respondent
Public Authority Officials in replying to the RTI application/ First Appeal. The Commission
observed that the RTI Act, 2005 stipulates time limits in its various provisions relating to
responding to RTI Applications, transfer of applications, filing and disposing of first appeal to
ensure that a culture of information dissemination is strengthened so that a robust functioning of
the democracy gets established. This was recognised by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in
Mujibur Rehman vs Central Information Commission (W.P. (C) 3845/2007)(Dated 28 April,
2009) wherein it was held as under:
1