Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.22 seconds)Smt. Rajesh And Others vs Rajbir Singh And Others on 29 January, 2010
32. Regarding loss of love and affection, I am being guided by the
judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Rajesh & ors Vs. Rajbir Singh &
ors,(2013) 9SCC 54 and with the inflation, the petitioners are entitled of Rs.
1,00,000/- towards love and affection. Accordingly, I award Rs. 1,00,000/-
towards love and affection; Rs. 25,000/- towards funeral charges & Rs.
10,000/- towards loss of estate. Therefore, in total, I hereby award a sum of
Rs. 11,41,695/-( Rs. 9,33,660/- + Rs. 73,035/- + Rs. 1,35,000/-) in favour of
the petitioners and against the respondents.
Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
General Manager, Kerala S.R.T.C vs Susamma Thomas on 6 January, 1993
35. As per the guidelines issued by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India
G.M Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v/s S.Susamma Thomas
(1994) 2 SCC 176 in order to avoid the money being frittered away, 50 % of
the amount awarded to each petitioners shall be kept in 5 FDRs of almost
equal amount for a period of 1,2,3,4 & 5 years. No loan or advance shall be
allowed against the said fixed deposit.
Section 304A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 337 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation ... vs Trilok Chandra & Others on 7 May, 1996
"5. The law is well settled that in case of compensation on
account of death, loss of dependency is to be computed by
adopting the multiplier having regard to the age of the deceased
or the claim whichever is higher[ U.P. State Road Transport
Corporation and Ors vs. Trilok Chandra and Ors, (1996) 4 SCC
362 and General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport
Corporation, Trivandrum Vs. Mrs. Susamma Thomas & ors,
(1994) 2SCC 176]
Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009
In the case reported as Sarla Verma & Ors. Vs. Delhi
Transport Corporation & Anr, (2009) 6SCC 121, Supreme Court,
inter-alia, ruled that the element of future prospects of increase
in income will not be granted in cases where the deceased was
" self employed" or was working on a "fixed salary".
Reshma Kumari & Ors vs Madan Mohan & Anr on 2 April, 2013
7. Against the above back drop by judgment dated 22/01/2016
passed in MAC Appeal No. 956/2012(Sunil Kumar Vs. Pyar
Mohd. ), the court has found it proper to follow the view taken
earlier by a learned single judge in MAC Apeal no. 189/2014
(HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. ltd. v. Smt. Lalta Devi & ors)
decided on 12.01.2015, presently taking the decision in Reshma
Kumari (supra) as the binding precedent, till such time the law
on the subject of future prospects for those who are " self
National Insurance Co Ltd. vs Pushpa Devi & Ors. on 6 February, 2014
Though this
view as affirmed by a bench of three Hon'ble Judges in Reshma
Suit No. 534/14 Page no. 9/13
Kumari & Ors Vs. Madan Mohan & Anr, (2013) 9SCC 65, on
account of divergence of views, as arising from the ruling in
Rajesh & Ors vs. Rajbir & Ors, (2013)9 SCC 54 the issue was
later referred to a larger bench, inter alia by order dated
02/07/2014 in National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pushpa &
ors, (2015) 9 SCC 166.