Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.51 seconds)
Baljit Singh vs Govt. Of Nctd on 25 October, 2016 cites

Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao vs Dean, Seth G.S. Medical College And Ors on 2 May, 1990

Regarding the other judgments referred to by the learned counsel for the applicant, viz., Veena (supra), Deepak Kumar (supra) and Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao (supra), suffice to state that after the ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in V.K. Sodhi (supra) that SCET is not a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India, these judgments will have no direct application to the instant case. As observed earlier, SCERT has chosen to adopt the same terms and tenure of service for its academic staff which are applicable to such staff in NCERT and has also chosen to adopt the reservation policy of Union of India adopted by NCERT. Thus, the OBCs notified in the Central list are entitled to claim reservation benefits in SCERT. The publication of Annexure A-4 notification in all India editions of leading newspapers, Annexure A-4 not containing any specific stipulation to the effect that only OBCs of Union Territory of Delhi are to be considered for OBC reservation benefits, order dated 13.06.2013 of UPSC and the GNCTD letter dated 17.01.2014 to UPSC would all go to corroborate it further that OBCs included in the Union list are entitled for reservation benefits in SCERT.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 276 - S Mukharji - Full Document

Deepak Kumar And Ors. vs District And Sessions Judge, Delhi And ... on 12 September, 2012

Regarding the other judgments referred to by the learned counsel for the applicant, viz., Veena (supra), Deepak Kumar (supra) and Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao (supra), suffice to state that after the ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in V.K. Sodhi (supra) that SCET is not a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India, these judgments will have no direct application to the instant case. As observed earlier, SCERT has chosen to adopt the same terms and tenure of service for its academic staff which are applicable to such staff in NCERT and has also chosen to adopt the reservation policy of Union of India adopted by NCERT. Thus, the OBCs notified in the Central list are entitled to claim reservation benefits in SCERT. The publication of Annexure A-4 notification in all India editions of leading newspapers, Annexure A-4 not containing any specific stipulation to the effect that only OBCs of Union Territory of Delhi are to be considered for OBC reservation benefits, order dated 13.06.2013 of UPSC and the GNCTD letter dated 17.01.2014 to UPSC would all go to corroborate it further that OBCs included in the Union list are entitled for reservation benefits in SCERT.
Delhi High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 53 - S R Bhat - Full Document

M.C.D vs Veena & Ors on 14 August, 2001

Regarding the other judgments referred to by the learned counsel for the applicant, viz., Veena (supra), Deepak Kumar (supra) and Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao (supra), suffice to state that after the ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in V.K. Sodhi (supra) that SCET is not a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India, these judgments will have no direct application to the instant case. As observed earlier, SCERT has chosen to adopt the same terms and tenure of service for its academic staff which are applicable to such staff in NCERT and has also chosen to adopt the reservation policy of Union of India adopted by NCERT. Thus, the OBCs notified in the Central list are entitled to claim reservation benefits in SCERT. The publication of Annexure A-4 notification in all India editions of leading newspapers, Annexure A-4 not containing any specific stipulation to the effect that only OBCs of Union Territory of Delhi are to be considered for OBC reservation benefits, order dated 13.06.2013 of UPSC and the GNCTD letter dated 17.01.2014 to UPSC would all go to corroborate it further that OBCs included in the Union list are entitled for reservation benefits in SCERT.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 82 - Full Document

Lt. Governor Of Delhi & Ors vs V.K. Sodhi & Ors on 14 August, 2007

Regarding the other judgments referred to by the learned counsel for the applicant, viz., Veena (supra), Deepak Kumar (supra) and Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao (supra), suffice to state that after the ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in V.K. Sodhi (supra) that SCET is not a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India, these judgments will have no direct application to the instant case. As observed earlier, SCERT has chosen to adopt the same terms and tenure of service for its academic staff which are applicable to such staff in NCERT and has also chosen to adopt the reservation policy of Union of India adopted by NCERT. Thus, the OBCs notified in the Central list are entitled to claim reservation benefits in SCERT. The publication of Annexure A-4 notification in all India editions of leading newspapers, Annexure A-4 not containing any specific stipulation to the effect that only OBCs of Union Territory of Delhi are to be considered for OBC reservation benefits, order dated 13.06.2013 of UPSC and the GNCTD letter dated 17.01.2014 to UPSC would all go to corroborate it further that OBCs included in the Union list are entitled for reservation benefits in SCERT.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 47 - P K Balasubramanyan - Full Document

Action Committee On Issue Of Caste ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 18 July, 1994

Summarizing, the Hon'ble High Court had said that (i) the decisions in Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao (supra), Action Committee v. Union of India, [1994) 5 SCC 244], State of Maharasthra v. Milind, [(2001) (1) SCC 4] and E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of A.P., [2005) 1 SCC 394] have all ruled that scheduled caste and tribe citizens moving from one State to another cannot claim reservation benefits, whether or not their caste is notified in the state where they migrate to, since the exercise of notifying scheduled castes or tribes is region (state) specific, i.e. "in relation" to the state of their origin, (ii) the considerations which apply to Scheduled Caste and Tribe citizens who migrate from state to state, apply equally in respect of those who migrate from a state to a union territory.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 186 - Full Document
1   2 Next