Mahadeo vs Shantibhai And Ors on 15 October, 1968
He was holding an office of profit and as such as per the
provisions contained under Section 24 of Cr.P.C., 1973, the
petitioner's father being a Public Prosecutor, having a special status
and getting statutory appointment, he can be considered under
category-1 of the guidelines issued by the Central Government
Authority and without considering the same, denial of admission of
the petitioner on the plea that the petitioner's father is not a regular
Central Govt. Employee, cannot be sustained in the eye of law. To
substantiate his contention he has relied upon the judgment of the
apex Court in Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi etc. etc. v. State of
4
U.P. and others, AIR 1991 SC 537, in Mahadeo v. Shantibhai and
others, 1969 2 SCR 422.