Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.26 seconds)Section 188 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Shyamal Kanth Guha (D) Thru Lrs.& Ors vs Meena Bose on 14 May, 2008
In construing the language of a
will, the Courts may look to the nature and the grammatical
meaning of the words used, and also consider surrounding
circumstances such as the position of the testator, his
family relationship, and other factors that may surface once
the Court puts itself in the position of a person making the
will [see Shyamal Kanti Guha v. Meena Bose, (2008) 8 SCC
115].
Rameshwar Baksh Singh vs Balraj Kuar on 23 July, 1935
...6. It may, however, be pointed out that this rule of
interpretation can be invoked only if different clauses
cannot be reconciled. (See: Rameshwar Bakhsh Singh
v. Balraj Kuar [AIR 1935 PC 187 : 1935 All LJ 1133] )."
Vemulapalli Ramakotayya vs Gutha Viraraghavayya on 1 November, 1928
In
Ramakottayya vs. Viraraghavayya, ILR, (1928) Mad.
Mrs. Lyla Darius Jehangir (Nee ... vs Bakhtawar Lentin Of Mumbai And Ors. ... on 12 December, 2006
19. A Division Bench of this Court interpreted both
sections in Lyla Darius Jehangir (nee Ghaswala) v
Bakhtawar Lentin of Mumbai & Ors., 2007(1) Mh.L.J. 545 =
2007(1) Bom.C.R. 915. In the case before it, the Division
Bench held, citing the Supreme Court decision in
Beepathumma (Paragraph numbers are from the
Manupatra report)
M.S.Bhavani vs M.S.Raghu Nandan on 5 March, 2020
13. I find substance in the submission of Mr. Sawant that
there was a clear and unambiguous disposition in favour of Dr.
Thomas and the subsequent desire expressed by Dr. Annie was
9/21
IAL15343-21INSL15324-21.DOC
an instance of non-dispositive expression. The reliance placed
by Mr. Sawant on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the
case of M. S. Bhavani and another vs. M. S. Raghu Nandan 1
appears well founded.
Mirzban Darabshaw Surti vs Cadric Vaz & Ors on 16 December, 2014
In order to bolster up this submission, Mr. Sawant placed
reliance on a judgment of this Court in the case of Mirzban
Darabshaw Surti vs. Cedric Vaz and another2. In the said case
a learned Single Judge has enunciated the principle that a
party cannot be permitted to accept the benefit under an
2 2015 (2) Mh.L.J. 184.
1