Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.27 seconds)Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. vs Dilbahar Singh on 27 August, 2014
31. Now what is the scope of such revisional
jurisdiction and the extent of the power which
the court can exercise is now well settled by a
five-Judge Bench of the apex Court reported in
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited vs.
Dilbahar Singh, (2014) 9 SCC 78. The findings
can be summarized as under:
Dattonpant Gopalvarao Devakate vs Vithabrao Maruthirao Janagavai on 3 April, 1975
(iv) The expression "revision" is meant to
convey the idea of much narrower
expression than the one expressed
by the expression "appeal". The
revisional power under the Rent
of
Control Act may not be as narrow as
the revisional power under Section
115 of the CPC but certainly it is not
wide enough to make the High Court
rt a second court of first appeal. While
holding so the Court reiterated the
view taken in Dattonpant Gopalvarao
Devakate vs. Vithalrao Maruthirao
Janagawal, (1975) 2 SCC 246.
Ram Dass vs Ishwar Chander And Others on 9 May, 1988
Sulochana, (1993) 1 SCC 499 and Ram Dass
(supra) was the backdrop in which the
Constitution Bench was called upon to decide the
scope of the revisional jurisdiction and the
expression "legality and propriety" provided in
the relevant statues. The essential question
being as to whether in exercise of such powers,
the revisional authority could reappreciate the
evidence or not. Finally the Court answered the
of
reference by making the following observations:-
Rukmini Amma Saradamma vs Kallyani Sulochana And Others on 16 December, 1992
Control) Act, 1960 and Haryana Urban (Control of
Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973. The incongruity in
the decisions rendered by the apex Court in
Rukmini Amma Saradamma vs. Kallyani
.
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973
The Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent control) Act, 1965
Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001
Raja Ram & Others vs Joginder Kaur on 13 December, 2011
29. A Full Bench of this court in Vinod alias
of
Raja vs. Smt. Joginder Kaur, 2012 (3) Him. L. R.
(FB) 1401 has held the right of appeal to be a
statutory right, not to be circumscribed by the
delegatee/State Government.
The Drugs (Control) Act, 1950
1