Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.25 seconds)The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs Shibu Metal Works on 9 November, 1964
The Supreme Court considered its four judgments in (1) Hindu Jea Band v. Regional Director, ESI Corporation case , (2) Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Shibu Metal Works , International Ore and Fertilizers (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation and (4) Cochin Shipping: Co. v. E.S.I. Corporation . In para 16 the Supreme Court observed as 1994-I-LLJ-636 at p. 641:
International Ore & ... vs Employees' State Insurance ... on 18 August, 1987
The Supreme Court considered its four judgments in (1) Hindu Jea Band v. Regional Director, ESI Corporation case , (2) Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Shibu Metal Works , International Ore and Fertilizers (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation and (4) Cochin Shipping: Co. v. E.S.I. Corporation . In para 16 the Supreme Court observed as 1994-I-LLJ-636 at p. 641:
Cochin Shipping Co. Etc. Etc vs E.S.I. Corporation on 19 August, 1992
The Supreme Court considered its four judgments in (1) Hindu Jea Band v. Regional Director, ESI Corporation case , (2) Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Shibu Metal Works , International Ore and Fertilizers (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation and (4) Cochin Shipping: Co. v. E.S.I. Corporation . In para 16 the Supreme Court observed as 1994-I-LLJ-636 at p. 641:
Employee'S State Insurance Corpn vs R.K.Swamy on 28 October, 1993
Employees' State Insurance Corporation v. R.K. Swamy and Ors. . It was between the ESI Corporation and the advertising agency. The basis of the dispute was of the same notification referred to above. Dattaram Advertising (P) Ltd. were informed by the ESI Corporation that they were covered by the notification and were required to comply with the provisions of the said Act and make contribution thereunder. The advertising company, referred to above, resisted the claim and filed an application before the E.S.I. Court contending that they were not covered under the notification. The Court dismissed their application and, the appeal came to be filed before this High Court. The single Judge held in favour of the advertising company. The ESI Corporation filed LPA and it was against the order of Division Bench which upheld the contention of the advertising company. The matter went to the Supreme Court.
Section 1 in The Explosive Substances Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Explosive Substances Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 39 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Hindu Jea Band, Jaipur vs Regional Director, Employees' ... on 20 February, 1987
The Supreme Court considered its four judgments in (1) Hindu Jea Band v. Regional Director, ESI Corporation case , (2) Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Shibu Metal Works , International Ore and Fertilizers (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation and (4) Cochin Shipping: Co. v. E.S.I. Corporation . In para 16 the Supreme Court observed as 1994-I-LLJ-636 at p. 641:
1