Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 52 (0.25 seconds)Section 24 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 26 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 30 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 193 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 351 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Kishore Chand vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 29 August, 1990
25. Law is laid down by the Supreme Court in BALDEV
RAJ: V. STATE OF HARYANA 1991 SCC (Cri) 659) thus:
Michael Machado & Anr vs Central Bureau Of Investigation & Anr on 17 February, 2000
"11. The basic requirements for invoking the
above section is that it should appear to the court
from the evidence collection during trial or in the
inquiry that some other person, who is not arraigned
as an accused in that case, has committed an offencd
for which that person could be tried together with
the accused already arraigned. It is not enough
that the court entertained some doubt, from the
evidence, about the involvement of another person in
the offence. In other words, the court must have
reasonable satisfaction from the evidence already
collected regarding two aspects. First is that the
other person has committed an offence. Second is
that for such offence that other person could as
well be tried along with the already arraigned
accused.