Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.44 seconds)

Sri Dinakar Uillal vs Commissioner Of Income Tax on 24 February, 2010

In the case of Dinakar Ullal vs CIT 323 ITR 452(Karnataka), the assesse e was a C ivil contr acto r and had f iled belate d re turn declar ing income of Rs. 50,240/- and was claiming ref und of Rs. 2,14,505/- on account of tax deduc ted at so urce. The last date of filing the re turn was 31.3.1997 but the retur n was filed late on 8 t h Se ptembe r 1997. The assessee sought condonatio n of delay by an application filed on 21 s t Se pt, 1998 by invok ing sec tio n 119(2)(b) of the Act which was initially rejec ted. Howeve r, on a writ petition the or de r for r ejection w as quashe d b y a single judge and remitted the matter back for fre sh consideration. On remand, the C ommissioner who was vested with the jur isdiction under I nstruc tio n No.1 3 of 2006 in r espec t o f claim upto Rs. 10 lakhs accepted the cause show n for delay in f iling the re turn but denie d intere st on ref und amount in view of the conditio n set o ut in C ircular No . 670 dated 26 t h Oct 1993. Therefor e, question before the C our t was whethe r these instructions were contrar y to the provision of sec tio n 244A of the Ac t which pr ovided fo r payment o f inte rest o n ref unds. This beco mes absol ute ly clear from the question fr amed by Hon'ble Cour t which is co ntaine d at placitum 6 and re ads as under:-
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 13 - R M Reddy - Full Document
1   2 Next