cites: 161535083

1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)

Tera Hi Tera Foods Pvt Ltd vs Raj Laxmi And Ors on 28 August, 2014 cites

Santosh Devi vs National Insurance Co.Ltd.& Ors on 23 April, 2012

Therefore, the Appellant is justified in seeking for re- enhancement under this head as well and we hold that the claimant-Appellant is entitled to 50% increase under this head as per the principle laid down by this Court in the case of Santosh Devi (supra)."

Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 2663 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

V. Mekala vs M. Malathi & Anr on 25 April, 2014

"19. Therefore, In the light of the principles laid down in the aforesaid case, it would be just and proper for this Court, and keeping in mind her past results, to take `10,000/- as her monthly notional income for computation of just and reasonable compensation under the head of loss of income. Further, the High Court has failed to take into consideration the future prospects of income based on the principles laid down by this Court in catena of judgments referred to supra.

Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 427 - V G Gowda - Full Document

Santosh Devi vs National Insurance Co.Ltd.& Ors on 23 April, 2012

V. Mekala vs M. Malathi & Anr on 25 April, 2014

Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]

Section 173 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]

The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Santosh Devi vs National Insurance Co.Ltd.& Ors on 23 April, 2012

V. Mekala vs M. Malathi & Anr on 25 April, 2014

Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]

Section 173 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]

The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988